{"id":5248,"date":"2011-07-10T08:16:06","date_gmt":"2011-03-06T00:03:10","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-03-05T11:31:48","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5248","title":{"rendered":"FL2 reaffirms that a search warrant is not required for pharmacy records"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>FL2 reaffirms (<a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=8241423630321326370&amp;q=39+So.+3d+524&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">State v. Tamulonis<\/a>, 39 So. 3d 524, 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), cert. denied, No. SC10-1539, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 80 (Fla. Jan. 3, 2011)) that there is no right to a search warrant to obtain defendant\u2019s pharmacy records in a drug investigation. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.2dca.org\/opinions\/Opinion_Pages\/Opinion_Page_2011\/March\/March%2002,%202011\/2D09-5091.pdf\">State v. Albritton<\/a>, 58 So. 3d 894 (Fla. App. 2d DCA 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>A drug dog alerted on defendant\u2019s car, but the drug search proved futile. \u201cHere, the Court concludes that the troopers had probable cause to search the entire truck, including the toolbox. Thus, the cash and documentary evidence contained inside Defendant\u2019s vehicle was properly seized and should be upheld.\u201d United States v. Vaughan, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20277 (M.D. Tenn. February 28, 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>Officer\u2019s mistake of law that a license plate frame could not cover words at the bottom of the license plate justified suppression of the evidence from the arrest. Also, in Massachusetts, when a stop is based on a statute or regulation that is alleged to be void, a motion to dismiss should be filed, not a motion to suppress, but this one can proceed. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.aspx?action=Search&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;eq=search&amp;fmqv=c&amp;fn=_top&amp;method=TNC&amp;n=2&amp;origin=Search&amp;query=TO%28ALLAPP+ALLAPPRS%29&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT746489231053&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB182739231053&amp;rlti=1&amp;rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault.wl&amp;rs=MAOR1.0&amp;service=Search&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;ss=CNT&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA312899231053&amp;sv=Split&amp;vr=1.0\">Commonwealth v. Miller<\/a>, 78 Mass. App. Ct. 860, 944 N.E.2d 179 (2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5248\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5248\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}