{"id":5225,"date":"2012-10-02T14:40:31","date_gmt":"2011-02-24T15:20:51","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-02-24T07:07:07","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5225","title":{"rendered":"OH4: Dog alert on car justified a patdown of the driver and passenger"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dog alert on car justified a patdown of the driver and passenger. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/4\/2011\/2011-ohio-763.pdf\">State v. Williams<\/a>, 2011 Ohio 763, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 657 (4th Dist. February 15, 2011).<\/p>\n<p>Gant could not be used as a new rule of criminal procedure to reopen post-conviction proceeding nine years later. Besides, the search was with probable cause. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.il.us\/court\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2011\/1stDistrict\/February\/1093337.pdf\">People v. Tripp<\/a>, 407 Ill. App. 3d 813, 348 Ill. Dec. 452, 944 N.E.2d 405 (2011).*<\/p>\n<p>Law requiring putting stickers on a car to identify the driver as under 21 did not violate, inter alia, the Fourth Amendment because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the age of the operator. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.judiciary.state.nj.us\/opinions\/a3139-09.pdf\">Trautmann v. Christie<\/a>, 418 N.J. Super. 559, 15 A.3d 22 (2011), aff&#8217;d per curiam 211 N.J. 300, 48 A.3d 1005 (2012).<\/p>\n<p>State just barely showed reasonable suspicion. Defendant was walking back and forth near a closed business in a high crime area late at night with his hand in his pocket.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.la4th.org\/pdf\/20101149DC%201.pdf\">State v. Francis<\/a>, 60 So. 3d 703 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2011):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[W]e are unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in finding under the totality of the circumstances that the officers had reasonable suspicion to warrant their belief that Mr. Francis was involved in (or was about to be involved in) some kind of criminal activity. These circumstances demonstrate at least a minimal level of reasonable suspicion to interfere with Mr. Francis\u2019 freedom of movement and to support a valid stop. Thus, we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion for the stop.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5225\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}