{"id":5168,"date":"2011-07-10T09:07:59","date_gmt":"2011-02-08T07:07:30","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-02-08T07:07:30","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5168","title":{"rendered":"CA7: General consent to search of a car includes prying up the rocker panels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>General consent includes prying up the rocker panel to look underneath. Moreover, standing by while it is happening, assuming he was, and not objecting was consent itself. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca7.uscourts.gov\/tmp\/580BR871.pdf\">United States v. Calvo-Saucedo<\/a>, 409 Fed. Appx. 21 (7th Cir. 2011) (unpublished):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Moreover, even if Calvo could not see Officer Thebeau&#8217;s search, lifting the molding was within the scope of Calvo&#8217;s initial consent. When a person is informed that an officer is looking for drugs in his car and he gives consent without explicit limitation, the consent permits law enforcement to search inside compartments and containers within the car, so long as the compartment or container can be opened without causing damage. See Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 251-52, 111 S. Ct. 1801, 114 L. Ed. 2d 297 (1991); United States v. Siwek, 453 F.3d 1079, 1085 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. Garrido-Santana, 360 F.3d 565, 576 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. Torres, 32 F.3d 225, 232 (7th Cir. 1994). <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Defendant had no standing to challenge the product of a search of another person\u2019s property he wasn\u2019t even connected to or that person\u2019s incriminating statements about him allegedly obtained by coercion. United States v. Brodtmann, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10857 (S.D. Fla. February 3, 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>A handcuffing does not turn a stop into an arrest. Also, a handcuffing does not neutralize any risk from the suspected weapon, so the frisk can still proceed. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.la4th.org\/pdf\/20100422OP%201.pdf\">State v. Welch<\/a>, 59 So. 3d 441 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2011).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5168\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5168\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}