Plaintiff\u2019s claim that government agents intercepted telephone calls between some other person and his lawyer in violation of the attorney-client privilege fails because he had no standing to complain. Labreche v. Chambers, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28163 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant can\u2019t show ineffective assistance of counsel of counsel on a search claim without showing the claim was meritorious, and this one isn\u2019t because it was valid as a probation search. United States v. Milton, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26433 (W.D.La. Feb. 11, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Failure to show that a motion to suppress counsel failed to file would have been successful defeats an IAC claim. Woodward v. Dir., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27513 (E.D.Tex. Feb. 15, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2255 petitioner doesn\u2019t show what Fourth Amendment issues defense counsel should have raised, what should have been suppressed, or that the effort would have been successful. United States v. Masias, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27958 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 14, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff\u2019s claim that government agents intercepted telephone calls between some other person and his lawyer in violation of the attorney-client privilege fails because he had no standing to complain. Labreche v. Chambers, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28163 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, … Continue reading