An officer found defendant selling fake IDs via Facebook. \u201cThe Facebook Warrant contained posts from this account indicating that the account-operator was selling fake IDs, including by specifying that the IDs could help people avoid warrants, fines, and jail time. \u2026 Given these posts, the issuing–judge had a substantial basis for concluding that a fair probability existed that evidence of a forgery–crime would be found in Kizzy Chapo’s Facebook account.\u201d The warrant was also not overbroad. United States v. Turner, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251554 (D.Nev. Dec. 7, 2021),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11183 (D.Nev. Jan. 21, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The district court credited the first officer at the scene of this stop that he could smell marijuana, despite not putting it in his reports. The second officer testified he didn\u2019t smell marijuana. The following dog alert gave probable cause for an automobile exception search. United States v. Fuchs<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2266 (6th Cir. Jan. 25, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" An officer found defendant selling fake IDs via Facebook. \u201cThe Facebook Warrant contained posts from this account indicating that the account-operator was selling fake IDs, including by specifying that the IDs could help people avoid warrants, fines, and jail time. … Continue reading