The statute of limitations for a false arrest case starts with release. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill. (Manuel II), 903 F.3d 667, 669 (7th Cir. 2018), on remand from Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill., 137 S. Ct. 911 (2017). Atwood v. Thompson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5731 (S.D.Ind. Jan. 10, 2022).* <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Whether exigency existed for police action in a \u00a7 1983 case is a fact question for a jury, but the facts here are not in dispute that there was no exigency. Marbury v. Karish, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5771 (E.D.Mich. Jan. 11, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For a case alleging a traffic stop interfered with the \u201cright to travel\u201d of a \u201csovereign man\u201d [not a \u201csovereign citizen\u201d] and alleged Fourth Amendment violations, see Bey v. Woolridge, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5818 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 12, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cBrennan tried to get Betts to stand behind the truck by invitation, explanation, command, and even by grasping his arm. And Brennan warned Betts more than once that he would be tased if he did not comply with his orders. Only when all those lesser options appeared to have failed did Brennan use his taser.\u201d \u201cIn sum, we conclude that Officer Brennan did not violate the Fourth Amendment by tasing Betts one time in order to arrest him.\u201d Betts v. Brennan<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 797 (5th Cir. Jan. 11, 2022).* [Remember: “Taser” is a proper noun (https:\/\/taser.com\/<\/a>) like Kleenex is (and Aspirin once was).]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The statute of limitations for a false arrest case starts with release. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill. (Manuel II), 903 F.3d 667, 669 (7th Cir. 2018), on remand from Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill., 137 S. Ct. 911 … Continue reading