{"id":50581,"date":"2021-11-30T12:49:00","date_gmt":"2021-11-30T17:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=50581"},"modified":"2021-12-01T07:47:12","modified_gmt":"2021-12-01T12:47:12","slug":"fl1-alleged-statutory-violation-for-seizing-alcohol-abusers-not-subject-to-any-exclusionary-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=50581","title":{"rendered":"FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>An officer\u2019s alleged violation of statutory procedures for dealing with alcohol abusers they encounter is not subject to an exclusionary rule. Nothing in the statute even suggests it. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.1dca.org\/content\/download\/811173\/opinion\/203098_DC05_11242021_142354_i.pdf\">Jones v. State<\/a>, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 15097 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 24, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The defendant\u2019s qualified immunity in an excessive force claim fails because of a factual dispute. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&amp;Path=Y2021\/D11-29\/C:21-1742:J:PerCuriam:aut:T:npDp:N:2798386:S:0\">Jones v. Kuschell<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 35126 (7th Cir. Nov. 29, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This 2254 petitioner can\u2019t overcome Stone bar to attempt to relitigate his Fourth Amendment claim. Brown v. AG of Nevada, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227850 (D.Nev. Nov. 29, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress for lack of probable cause and such a lack that the good faith exception doesn\u2019t apply fails. There is probable cause. United States v. Morgan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227933 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 24, 2021).* (The purpose of 1984 good faith exception was for just this. This argument almost never succeeds.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An officer\u2019s alleged violation of statutory procedures for dealing with alcohol abusers they encounter is not subject to an exclusionary rule. Nothing in the statute even suggests it. Jones v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 15097 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=50581\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,126,20,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-issue-preclusion","category-probable-cause","category-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=50581"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50590,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50581\/revisions\/50590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=50581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=50581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=50581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}