{"id":5054,"date":"2011-07-10T09:23:38","date_gmt":"2011-01-04T07:23:42","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-01-04T07:23:42","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5054","title":{"rendered":"OH2: Report of burglary in progress was exigency for entry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A report of neighbors that there was a burglary in progress in a house that was previously unoccupied for two weeks and seeing defendants running away from the house was exigency for an entry into the house to investigate additional suspects or victims. Drying marijuana was found. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/2\/2010\/2010-ohio-6480.pdf\">State v. Goodwin<\/a>, 2010 Ohio 6480, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 5387 (2d Dist. December 29, 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Leaving stuff in an abandoned house was a waiver of any expectation of privacy. State v. Wilson, 56 So. 3d 375 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant validly consented to a BAC test. He was on probation, and he would have been revoked for refusing consent. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/A138610.htm\">State v. Hiner<\/a>, 240 Ore. App. 175, 246 P.3d 35 (2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Detailed report from identified CI was sufficient in itself to provide probable cause once corroborated. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/A138931.htm\">State v. Mitchele<\/a>, 240 Ore. App. 86, 251 P.3d 760 (2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s girlfriend\u2019s mother who was a co-lessee and paid the rent had sufficient common authority to consent to a search of their bedroom. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.ny.us\/reporter\/3dseries\/2010\/2010_09683.htm\">People v Holmes<\/a>, 2010 NY Slip Op 9683, 79 A.D.3d 1681, 913 N.Y.S.2d 480 (4th Dept. 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>The 18 minute stop here for a window tinting citation was not unreasonably prolonged so the drug dog could get there 15 minutes after being called. [Right!] <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/2\/2010\/2010-ohio-6476.pdf\">State v. Dewitt<\/a>, 2010 Ohio 6476, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 5388 (2d Dist. December 29, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5054\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}