Using defendant\u2019s key to unlock a lockbox within the terms of the search warrant was not unreasonable. United States v. Frady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205784 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021).* [Does he really expect that breaking into it is the only way to search? Officers should be encouraged to not destroy property during raids.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The district court made no specific findings of voluntariness of consent, but the record supports the conclusion that it was. United States v. Ojedokun<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32122 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n This heading in the opinion says it all: \u201cBecause the warrant’s false statements are immaterial to a finding of probable cause, Defendant is not entitled to a Franks hearing.\u201d United States v. Segura, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206023 (D.N.M. Oct. 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n An unlawful detention claim accrues when the detention ends. The statute of limitations here has expired. Banter v. Adams Cty., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206107 (N.D.Ind. Oct. 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Using defendant\u2019s key to unlock a lockbox within the terms of the search warrant was not unreasonable. United States v. Frady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205784 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021).* [Does he really expect that breaking into it is the … Continue reading