Two affidavits for search warrants against the defendant can be read together to support each other. Here, officers had probable cause to believe that defendant was a drug dealer, and they got a warrant to install a GPS on a package for him to see where it would go. When the package stopped moving, that information was used to get a search warrant for the place. United States v. Abdul-Ganui, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131993 (W.D. Pa. December 14, 2010):<\/p>\n
Other cases have followed these principles and permitted \u201cprobable cause to be determined from separate affidavits filed to obtain several warrants in the same criminal investigation.\u201d State v. Smith<\/a>, 836 S.W.2d 137, 140 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). In Smith, two separate affidavits were simultaneously presented to a magistrate judge in support of two different warrants, one warrant authorizing the search of the defendant\u2019s residence and the other authorizing procurement of a blood sample. The court rejected the argument that the affidavit in support of the first warrant could not be used to determine whether probable cause existed for the second. It stated that \u201cit would be hypertechnical for the [magistrate judge] not to act upon an entire picture disclosed to him in interrelated affidavits presented to him on the same day.\u201d Id.; accord State v. Kalai<\/a>, 56 Haw. 366, 537 P.2d 8, 10 (Haw. 1975) (\u201cWhere two closely related affidavits, referring to the same individual and the same criminal charge, are presented to the issuing magistrate simultaneously, he may consider both for the purpose of ascertaining the existence of probable cause.\u201d); United States v. Fogarty<\/a>, 663 F.2d 928, 929-30 (9th Cir. 1981) (A magistrate judge is not required to read an affidavit with \u201ctunnel vision\u201d and thus is not limited to the four corners of a single affidavit where \u201cfacts are presented simultaneously in two related affidavits seeking two warrants.\u201d).<\/p>\n
Similarly, these principles have been applied to scenarios where the affidavits were not presented simultaneously. In Kaiser v. Lief<\/a>, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a magistrate judge may rely on facts included in two separate affidavits presented a day apart. In upholding the search, the court recognized that while the two affidavits were not presented to the magistrate judge on the same day, \u201call of the information on which the magistrate relied was included in sworn documents.\u201d 874 F.2d 732, 735 (10th Cir. 1989). In United States v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, Livernois-Lyndon Streets, Safety Deposit Box # 127, Detroit, Michigan<\/a>, two separate affidavits were presented to a magistrate judge within a day of each other by an officer seeking warrants to search the defendant\u2019s residence and security deposit box. The Sixth Circuit held that the issuing magistrate judge was entitled to consider both affidavits in reaching a probable cause finding, and opined that it \u201cwould needlessly restrict the discretion of a magistrate to hold that two affidavits filed so close in time and referring to a single criminal investigation which was still continuing could not be considered together in determining whether to authorize a further search.\u201d 536 F.2d 699, 702 (6th Cir. 1976); accord United States v. Markis<\/a>, 352 F.2d 860, 864 (2d Cir. 1965) (upholding magistrate judge\u2019s probable cause determination based on affidavits relating to the same person and the same offense presented four days apart), vacated on other grounds, Markis v. United States, 387 U.S. 425, 87 S. Ct. 1709, 18 L. Ed. 2d 864 (1967); Cf. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Saleh<\/a>, 396 Mass. 406, 486 N.E.2d 706, 709 (Mass. 1985) (observing in upholding probable cause determination based on two separate affidavits that \u201c[e]ach affidavit contributes to the total picture from which the magistrate determines probable cause.\u201d).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
So, how hard is it to get a search warrant to install a GPS? Not that hard.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading