{"id":49769,"date":"2021-09-26T08:40:51","date_gmt":"2021-09-26T13:40:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49769"},"modified":"2021-09-26T08:40:51","modified_gmt":"2021-09-26T13:40:51","slug":"il-mere-visitor-present-at-time-of-sw-execution-could-not-be-searched-without-reason","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49769","title":{"rendered":"IL: Mere visitor present at time of SW execution could not be searched without reason"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant was merely on the premises raided, and he was clearly not the person sought. There were no furtive gestures or other justification. The search of his person was unreasonable. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.illinoiscourts.gov\/resources\/1d2c92d7-6d99-41bd-ad27-a6263465a472\/file\">People v. Duffie<\/a>, 2021 IL App (1st) 171620, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 518 (Sept. 24, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lifetime satellite based monitoring here is shown to be a reasonable search. \u201cThe purpose of the SBM program to protect the public from sex crimes is of paramount importance, and an aggravated offender&#8217;s reasonable expectation of privacy is significantly diminished. The incremental nature of a search providing location information and the method of data collection via an ankle bracelet are more inconvenient than intrusive. Moreover, the SBM program provides a particularized procedure for imposing SBM and thus does not violate Article I, Section 20.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/appellate.nccourts.org\/opinions\/?c=1&amp;pdf=40740\">State v. Hilton<\/a>, 2021-NCSC-115, 2021 N.C. LEXIS 937 (Sept. 24, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant doesn\u2019t get to use a plain error type of review to an unpreserved lifetime satellite based monitoring condition because it is meritless anyway. <a href=\"https:\/\/appellate.nccourts.org\/opinions\/?c=1&amp;pdf=40745\">State v. Ricks<\/a>, 2021-NCSC-116, 2021 N.C. LEXIS 928 (Sept. 24, 2021).*<br \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was merely on the premises raided, and he was clearly not the person sought. There were no furtive gestures or other justification. The search of his person was unreasonable. People v. Duffie, 2021 IL App (1st) 171620, 2021 Ill. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49769\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58,59,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-probationparole-search","category-scope-of-search","category-warrant-execution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49769"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49770,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49769\/revisions\/49770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}