{"id":49534,"date":"2021-08-31T05:07:59","date_gmt":"2021-08-31T10:07:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49534"},"modified":"2021-08-31T05:07:59","modified_gmt":"2021-08-31T10:07:59","slug":"ca10-order-to-get-out-of-car-doesnt-unreasonably-extend-stop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49534","title":{"rendered":"CA10: Order to get out of car doesn&#8217;t unreasonably extend stop"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The officer\u2019s order for defendant to get out of the car was reasonable and did not unreasonably prolong the stop. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/sites\/ca10\/files\/opinions\/010110568620.pdf\">United States v. Malone<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 26136 (10th Cir. Aug. 30, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWhile Fisk brings his assignment of error under both the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution, he offers no argument as to why we should conclude that the analysis in this case should differ under these two constitutional provisions. Because Fisk has not offered any \u2018persuasive reasons\u2019 to find that Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourth Amendment differ with respect to his claims, we will analyze the two together.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/12\/2021\/2021-Ohio-2989.pdf\">State v. Fisk<\/a>, 2021-Ohio-2989, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 2946 (12th Dist. Aug. 30, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cHowever, we are unable to consider this facet of Thompson&#8217;s ineffective-assistance argument because the supposedly deficient search-warrant affidavit is not part of the record on appeal.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/3\/2021\/2021-Ohio-2979.pdf\">State v. Thompson<\/a>, 2021-Ohio-2979, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 2934 (3d Dist. Aug. 30, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The officer\u2019s order for defendant to get out of the car was reasonable and did not unreasonably prolong the stop. United States v. Malone, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 26136 (10th Cir. Aug. 30, 2021). \u201cWhile Fisk brings his assignment of &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49534\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,35,53,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ineffective-assistance","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-state-constitution","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49534"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49534\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49535,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49534\/revisions\/49535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}