The government\u2019s use of a cell site simulator to track another person\u2019s cell phone didn\u2019t infringe on defendant\u2019s rights. United States v. Goldsby, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160651 (D.Nev. Aug. 25, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court order (six years pre-Carpenter) showed probable cause for CSLI. People v. Costan<\/a>, 2021 NY Slip Op 04760, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4879 (2d Dept. Aug. 25, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a \u00a7 1983 Franks claim, removing the offending information from the application for the warrant still left probable cause. The district court erred in not granting the officer qualified immunity. Davis v. Hodgkiss<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 25587 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the totality, defendant consented to a search of his cell phone. United States v. Hovan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160475 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 25, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The government\u2019s use of a cell site simulator to track another person\u2019s cell phone didn\u2019t infringe on defendant\u2019s rights. United States v. Goldsby, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160651 (D.Nev. Aug. 25, 2021). The court order (six years pre-Carpenter) showed probable … Continue reading