Passing reference to a Fourth Amendment violation isn\u2019t enough to preserve the issue. United States v. Polaco-Hance, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132937 (D.P.R. July 16, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for the search of defendant\u2019s car under the warrant. A plain view before the search also supports it. United States v. Shostak, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133084 (D.Mont. July 16, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant obtained temporary release from custody for trial preparation and visited the USAO with his attorneys to look at discovery. He apparently purloined pages of the discovery which were found in his cell with a search warrant. Obstruction enhancement upheld. United States v. Mehmood<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 21132 (6th Cir. July 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not preserving a Carpenter issue before Carpenter was decided. Mero v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133182 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Passing reference to a Fourth Amendment violation isn\u2019t enough to preserve the issue. United States v. Polaco-Hance, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132937 (D.P.R. July 16, 2021). There was probable cause for the search of defendant\u2019s car under the warrant. A … Continue reading