{"id":4907,"date":"2011-05-02T10:41:50","date_gmt":"2010-11-19T13:14:08","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-11-19T13:14:08","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4907","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Police had no exigent circumstances for entry into house where gun  was fired where there was no indication anyone inside was injured"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant discharged a gun in his house, and he was in custody. The police had no reason to believe there was anyone else in the house, let alone injured in the house, so the suppression order was affirmed. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2010\/11\/16\/09-10459.pdf\">United States v. Espinoza<\/a>, 403 Fed. Appx. 239 (9th Cir. 2010) (unpublished):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The government&#8217;s argument is not supported by the record. At the time of the entry into Espinoza&#8217;s house, Espinoza was in custody and detained in the back of a police car. Neighbors had reported that Espinoza lived alone, and no one reported seeing or hearing anyone besides Espinoza inside the house. When the police arrived, they did not see anyone enter the house or hear any other voices coming from inside. In short, there were no facts upon which an officer could base a reasonable belief that an emergency existed after Espinoza was in custody. See <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=17626460342388586349&amp;q=6+F.3d+673&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2002\">United States v. Gooch<\/a>, 6 F.3d 673, 679 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding that warrantless search of a shooting suspect&#8217;s tent was unreasonable because suspect was in custody and there was no actual ongoing threat despite the recent discharge of a firearm).<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court stated in <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=11813583998812458733&amp;q=Michigan+v.+Fisher&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2002\">Michigan v. Fisher<\/a> that officers do not require \u201cironclad proof of &#8216;a likely serious, life-threatening&#8217; injury to invoke the emergency aid exception.\u201d 130 S. Ct. 546, 549, 175 L. Ed. 2d 410 (2009). There, the police encountered a crazed, bleeding man barricaded inside his house throwing objects and shouting obscenities at the police. Id. at 547. The Court ruled that under those circumstances, even though it was doubtful that the man was seriously injured, a reasonable officer could have believed that the man or someone else inside might have needed immediate medical attention or faced imminent harm. Id. at 548-49. We do not read that fact-specific opinion to hold broadly that warrantless entry into a home is always justified where the police cannot confirm that there are no injured victims inside a house. We recognize the need for police officers to investigate and respond to credible threats of injury. Nothing in <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=11813583998812458733&amp;q=Michigan+v.+Fisher&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2002\">Michigan v. Fisher<\/a>, however, indicates that the mere discharge of a firearm inside a house vitiates the protections of the Fourth Amendment when the shooting suspect is in custody and there are no circumstances suggesting that anyone else was present, much less injured.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4907\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}