While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn\u2019t considering the nature of the allegations. \u201c[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale after only two days.\u201d United States v. Key, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129497 (S.D. Ga. June 24, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant consented to delivery of a flash drive to HSI in case of hiring undocumented workers. United States v. Kuzelka, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129175 (N.D. Ill. July 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s computers was hardly bare bones. \u201cConsidering Detective Yates’s attestations, and \u2018all of the circumstances\u2019 surrounding the issuance of the Computer Search Warrant, see Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 n.23, the Court finds that the Yates Affidavit did not contain mere conclusory statements and provided sufficient indicia of probable cause such that an executing officer’s belief in the existence of such probable cause was not completely unreasonable. The Court further finds that Defendant has not shown how additional clarifying details, such as what a Tor Browser is, were necessary in light of the circumstances surrounding and context of the Yates Affidavit.\u201d United States v. Hanes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129364 (N.D. Tex. July 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn\u2019t considering the nature of the allegations. \u201c[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale … Continue reading