{"id":4880,"date":"2011-05-16T07:36:37","date_gmt":"2010-11-12T00:02:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-11-11T18:28:12","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4880","title":{"rendered":"ID: The exclusionary rule does not apply in civil child protection cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The exclusionary rule does not apply in child protection cases (citing a lot of cases from various jurisdictions). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/Doe,%2037746%20Opn.pdf\">Idaho Dep&#8217;t of Health &amp; Welfare v. Doe<\/a>, 244 P.3d 247 (Idaho App. 2010).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s implied consent was still valid despite the officer\u2019s comment that if she didn\u2019t comply with giving a breath test, a blood test would occur. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/leclercq%2037191.pdf\">State v. Leclercq<\/a>, 149 Idaho 905, 243 P.3d 1093 (App. 2010)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Here, Trooper DeBie informed LeClercq of his intention to obtain a blood draw should she refuse to comply with the breath test. The unpleasantness of the available options did not render the officer\u2019s statement coercive. The magistrate determined that while the officer\u2019s use of the word \u201cforce\u201d to describe what would happen if LeClercq refused the breath test was troubling, under the totality of the circumstances, the officer&#8217;s actions were permissible. Informing a suspect that refusal of a breath test will result in a \u201cforcible\u201d blood draw may not be an advisable practice. However, Trooper DeBie\u2019s statement, in light of all of the circumstances, did not amount to coercion such that it rendered LeClercq\u2019s implied consent involuntary.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4880\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}