{"id":48267,"date":"2021-04-29T07:55:06","date_gmt":"2021-04-29T12:55:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48267"},"modified":"2021-04-29T08:41:20","modified_gmt":"2021-04-29T13:41:20","slug":"wi-burning-mj-in-a-house-is-exigency-of-evidence-being-destroyed-by-burning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48267","title":{"rendered":"WI: Burning mj in a house is exigency of evidence being destroyed by burning"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The smell of burning marijuana is exigent circumstances because the contraband is being destroyed by burning. State v. B.W.R.<\/a>, 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 201 (Apr. 28, 2021) (unpublished).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under Birchfield, \u201cAn increased penalty for the warrantless blood draw refusal revocation is an increased penalty-regardless whether it takes place in the same proceeding or a later proceeding, it impermissibly burdens or penalizes a defendant’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from an unreasonable warrantless search.\u201d State v. Forrett<\/a>, 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 202 (Apr. 28, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defendant\u2019s proffer of a potential Franks violation was enough to get him a hearing. The issue was whether the place named to be searched was his \u201cprimary\u201d residence, but it was one of five and that was a critical fact. United States v. Nelson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80838 (D. Minn. Apr. 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The collective knowledge of the totality of reasonable suspicion justified defendant\u2019s stop as a walking suspicious person. United States v. Critchfield, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80878 (N.D. W.Va. Apr. 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not challenging defendant\u2019s search either under the automobile exception or inventory. Hernandez v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80803 (D. Idaho Apr. 23, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The smell of burning marijuana is exigent circumstances because the contraband is being destroyed by burning. State v. B.W.R., 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 201 (Apr. 28, 2021) (unpublished). Under Birchfield, \u201cAn increased penalty for the warrantless blood draw refusal revocation … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[93,55,3,21,23,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48267","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-collective-knowledge","category-drug-testing","category-emergency-exigency","category-franks-doctrine","category-ineffective-assistance","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48267","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48267"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48267\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48270,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48267\/revisions\/48270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}