{"id":47966,"date":"2021-04-03T04:06:29","date_gmt":"2021-04-03T09:06:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47966"},"modified":"2021-04-03T09:03:57","modified_gmt":"2021-04-03T14:03:57","slug":"ca3-mid-trial-suppression-argument-wasnt-timely","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47966","title":{"rendered":"CA3: Mid-trial suppression argument wasn&#8217;t timely"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s mid-trial suppression motion was untimely despite the defense claim that this was a second search he wasn\u2019t aware of until it came up at trial. <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.ca3.uscourts.gov\/opinarch\/202461np.pdf\">United States v. Elcock<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 9503 (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant was sitting in his car on a Hampton Inn parking lot and was suspiciously loitering as far as hotel management was concerned, so they called the police. When the police arrived, defendant left and the officer followed. Defendant then fled in a high speed chase. Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not challenging the officer\u2019s just showing up. [As if this is justification for his flight.] Moreover, \u201cIn the instant appeal, Morrison does not even mention Terry v. Ohio, nor does he discuss or argue that the officer&#8217;s actions are violative of the &#8220;reasonable suspicion&#8221; standard for initiating a Terry stop.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.mo.gov\/file.jsp?id=175869\">Morrison v. State<\/a>, 2021 Mo. App. LEXIS 424 (Mar. 30, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s mid-trial suppression motion was untimely despite the defense claim that this was a second search he wasn\u2019t aware of until it came up at trial. United States v. Elcock, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 9503 (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2021). &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47966\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,96,111,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-pleading","category-standards-of-review","category-suppression-hearings","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47966"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47979,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47966\/revisions\/47979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}