{"id":47702,"date":"2021-03-15T07:35:55","date_gmt":"2021-03-15T12:35:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47702"},"modified":"2021-03-15T07:35:55","modified_gmt":"2021-03-15T12:35:55","slug":"m-d-la-anonymous-911-call-was-corroborated-enough-for-navarette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47702","title":{"rendered":"M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The anonymous 911 call about flashing a gun at children satisfied Navarette. The officer was a mile from the place mentioned in the report and arrived shortly thereafter and saw the person the call reported. While the 911 caller could not be fully corroborated, enough was for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Burrell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46880 (M.D. La. Mar. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBefore searching Rupert’s car, Chicago police had a report of three individuals possessing an incendiary device in the area where they saw the car. (R&R at 24.) Chicago police spotted several individuals matching the report’s description in that area standing outside a maroon sedan with its doors open. (Id.) As the police approached, two of the individuals ran; the police took three others into custody. (Id.) Under these circumstances, Chicago police had probable cause to believe that the car contained contraband or other evidence of a crime. A person of reasonable caution, when seeing people near a car with its doors open, would assume that the car is in their possession and that if those people are suspected of a crime, the car may contain evidence of that crime.\u201d United States v. Rupert, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46798 (D. Minn. Mar. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The anonymous 911 call about flashing a gun at children satisfied Navarette. The officer was a mile from the place mentioned in the report and arrived shortly thereafter and saw the person the call reported. While the 911 caller could … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44,20,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-informant-hearsay","category-probable-cause","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47702"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47703,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47702\/revisions\/47703"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}