{"id":47540,"date":"2021-03-04T09:47:57","date_gmt":"2021-03-04T14:47:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47540"},"modified":"2021-03-04T09:47:57","modified_gmt":"2021-03-04T14:47:57","slug":"d-kan-frantic-furtive-movements-as-officers-approached-stopped-car-justified-drawing-weapons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47540","title":{"rendered":"D.Kan.: &#8220;Frantic&#8221; furtive movements as officers approached stopped car justified drawing weapons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s \u201cfrantic\u201d furtive movements as he stopped during a traffic stop justified officers drawing down on him as they approached the car. \u201cThen during Solis&#8217;s temporary detention, other facts arose establishing probable cause to arrest him. The Court therefore concludes that the Officers&#8217; seizure of Solis was lawful because of an officer safety exigency and Solis&#8217;s subsequent arrest was lawful because it was based on probable cause.\u201d United States v. Solis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38134 (D. Kan. Mar. 2, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is settled that the exclusionary rule does not apply in federal supervised release revocation proceedings. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca4.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/204213.U.pdf\">United States v. Banks<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6057 (4th Cir. Mar. 2, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s \u201cfrantic\u201d furtive movements as he stopped during a traffic stop justified officers drawing down on him as they approached the car. \u201cThen during Solis&#8217;s temporary detention, other facts arose establishing probable cause to arrest him. The Court therefore concludes &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=47540\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47540"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47540\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47541,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47540\/revisions\/47541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}