\u201cApplying this standard, the Field Affidavit is clearly not a bare bones affidavit. Intercepted phone calls, physical surveillance and trash pulls, along with information learned from confidential sources, would allow a reasonable officer \u2018employing a healthy dose of common sense\u2019 to conclude that the parking lot of Luxury Sports was an ongoing site of drug trafficking. See id. at 502 (citing United States v. Greene, 250 F.3d 471, 479 (6th Cir. 2001)). One of the traffickers, Jerry Vaughn, was associated on paper with Luxury Sports, the corporate entity. Plus, Vaughn entered the Luxury Sports office building structure after one of his suspected drug sales. Plus, another suspected trafficker, who drove a vehicle registered to Luxury Sports, entered the structure with Vaughn, first checking the Luxury Sports mailbox. These details more than suffice to connect drug trafficking with the inside of the Luxury Sports office building as well.\u201d United States v. Scott, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37302 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cApplying this standard, the Field Affidavit is clearly not a bare bones affidavit. Intercepted phone calls, physical surveillance and trash pulls, along with information learned from confidential sources, would allow a reasonable officer \u2018employing a healthy dose of common sense\u2019 … Continue reading