The officer observed defendant swerve over the double yellow line and made a stop to issue a warning. A dog was called and arrived in ten minutes. The stop took longer than normal because the officer had to go \u201cold school\u201d and radio in information and get a response. \u201cHe then had to handwrite the warning-something he had begun but could not complete because, by the time the canine alerted, dispatch had not yet confirmed the driver’s information. There is nothing unusual or unreasonable about the approximate ten minutes that passed-particularly so when Trooper Drudge still needed to hear from dispatch to complete his mission. \u2026 That is sufficient basis alone to deny this motion.\u201d United States v. Williams, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31187 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 19, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court disagrees with the USMJ\u2019s conclusion there was no reasonable suspicion on the totality to continue the stop of defendant with no DL. Motion to suppress denied. United States v. Taylor, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31128 (D. Nev. Feb. 18, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The officer observed defendant swerve over the double yellow line and made a stop to issue a warning. A dog was called and arrived in ten minutes. The stop took longer than normal because the officer had to go \u201cold … Continue reading