Defendant was merely on the premises when a search warrant was executed, and he attempted to hide his cell phone. That was not reason enough to search his cell phone. United States v. Garvey, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98527 (D. V.I. September 17, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge to his wiretap failed because the statements weren\u2019t false. United States v. Garvey, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98539 (D. V.I. September 17, 2010).*<\/p>\n
On the totality of circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion for defendant\u2019s stop. United States v. Garvey, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98462 (D. V.I. September 17, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Off-duty officer working at a private club escorted defendant off the premises because of an altercation with another. The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car because of the possibility he was armed. The officer determined there was a warrant out for the defendant, so he was taken into custody and the gun was in plain view. United States v. Robinson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98523 (E.D. Ark. September 20, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading