Defendant could not be compelled to give a DNA sample where the government showed no connection to the investigation. Order granting it vacated. United States v. Flanders, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96752 (D. V.I. September 15, 2010).<\/p>\n
\u201c[N]o reasonable expectation of privacy exists in an IP address, because that information is also conveyed to and, indeed, from third parties, including ISPs. \u2018IP addresses are not merely passively conveyed through third party equipment, but rather are voluntarily turned over in order to direct the third party\u2019s servers.\u2019\u201d United States v. Christie, 624 F.3d 558 (3d Cir. September 15, 2010).* [Yeah, like anyone knows any of this, that IP addresses are \u201cvoluntarily turned over.\u201d Voluntary means you know what is being turned over. Pure fiction.]<\/p>\n
As the facts developed during the questions asked of the two men in the car with their children, reasonable suspicion was developing to justify holding them there longer. United States v. Jayawardana, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96599 (W.D. Tex. September 15, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading