\u201cAlthough many reasonable people may agree that the stop at issue here was a highly technical, \u2018ticky-tacky\u2019 sort of traffic stop, there is no doubt that Florida law requires a driver to stop at a clearly marked stop line before entering a crosswalk or intersection.\u201d United States v. Brown, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231148 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 9, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search warrant here was, in fact, based on an independent source and not a preliminary entry. The warrant would have issued anyway. The R&R is adopted. United States v. Whipple, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230871 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 9, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn the Eighth Circuit, the smell of marijuana constitutes probable cause for an officer to search a vehicle for drugs.\u201d Defense counsel not challenging uncontested facts wasn\u2019t IAC. United States v. Phillips, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230866 (D. Neb. Dec. 9, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cAlthough many reasonable people may agree that the stop at issue here was a highly technical, \u2018ticky-tacky\u2019 sort of traffic stop, there is no doubt that Florida law requires a driver to stop at a clearly marked stop line before … Continue reading