Defendant was arrested for disorderly for a \u201cloud altercation\u201d with somebody who ordered him off his property. The officer was justified asking for consent for a patdown for weapons. State v. Gant, 237 Ore. App. 74, 239 P.3d 269 (2010).*<\/p>\n
Defendant juvenile\u2019s mother and stepfather consented to the search of his bedroom. The consent was truly voluntary despite the threat to get a search warrant, which was not baseless because the officers had probable cause. State v. Reed<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 715 (August 31, 2010).*<\/p>\n Indian casino security officer was invited into the hotel room by the registered guest, and that was a valid entry. United States v. Walker, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92244 (D.S.D. August 17, 2010).*<\/p>\n Defendant was stopped for reckless driving in a National Forest for cutting donuts with his car in the snow. The officer smelled burnt marijuana while standing at the car window, and that justified the search of the car. United States v. Chelgren, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91818 (E.D. Cal. August 9, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading