A fact question for trial was shown as to whether plaintiff\u2019s strip search because she was detained because of an open container violation occurred in the car in which she was riding was necessary. She was strip searched before she went to the bathroom, and the male detainees with her weren\u2019t. Moreover, her body cavity search would be unconstitutional if her allegations are believed by a jury. Lucero v. Bush, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90921 (D. S.D. September 1, 2010).*<\/p>\n
The CI\u2019s information corroborated by the officers\u2019 surveillance was sufficient to support issuance of the search warrant. United States v. Powell, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91278 (E.D. Mich. September 2, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Officer\u2019s observation of a gun and drugs through the car window was justification for search of the car. The defendant\u2019s car was not even stopped by the officer; it was in a strip club parking lot when the officer approached to talk to them. United States v. Johnson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91489 (N.D. Ind. September 2, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading