{"id":46105,"date":"2020-11-12T07:18:51","date_gmt":"2020-11-12T12:18:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46105"},"modified":"2020-11-12T07:18:51","modified_gmt":"2020-11-12T12:18:51","slug":"n-d-cal-failure-to-mention-denial-of-a-tro-in-civil-litigation-over-similar-issue-material-enough-to-get-franks-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46105","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Cal.: Failure to mention denial of a TRO in civil litigation over similar issue material enough to get <em>Franks<\/em> hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The fact a TRO had been denied in a civil case involving some of the same facts was potentially material under Franks, and he gets a Franks hearing. Also, defendants have no standing in the search of a co-conspirator\u2019s home. United States v. Chen, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210476 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant asserts his Fourth Amendment claim again in his 2254 habeas petition, and it\u2019s barred under Stone v. Powell. [Essentially, this is just an effort to relitigate.] Hammond v. Gastelo, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210444 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant pled guilty but now claims that defense counsel didn\u2019t properly advise him about potential Fourth Amendment claims. The plea was still voluntary and waives his Fourth Amendment claims. <a href=\"https:\/\/courts.delaware.gov\/Opinions\/Download.aspx?id=312890\">State v. Perez<\/a>, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 2881 (Nov. 2, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The fact a TRO had been denied in a civil case involving some of the same facts was potentially material under Franks, and he gets a Franks hearing. Also, defendants have no standing in the search of a co-conspirator\u2019s home. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46105\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,23,126],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine","category-ineffective-assistance","category-issue-preclusion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=46105"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46105\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46106,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46105\/revisions\/46106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=46105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=46105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=46105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}