{"id":4594,"date":"2011-03-01T07:26:39","date_gmt":"2010-08-28T00:15:29","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-08-27T18:17:04","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4594","title":{"rendered":"OK: No <em>Gant<\/em> GFE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Oklahoma refuses to apply a <em>Gant<\/em> good faith exception. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oscn.net\/applications\/oscn\/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=461117\">Baxter v. State<\/a>, 2010 OK CR 20, 238 P.3d 934 (2010)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[*P12]  The State argues that application of the law here would have no deterrent effect. Given the requirement, discussed  above, that Gant must be applied to cases pending on direct appeal when it was decided, this argument is misplaced. In addition, applying Gant  will have a deterrent effect. It will confirm to law enforcement officers in Oklahoma the change in the law and serve as an example and an explanation of the reason law enforcement agencies must adapt their vehicle search practice to conform to the law in Gant.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A gun found underneath the seat cushion where defendant was seated when he was arrested was within his immediate area of control and was properly the subject of a search incident. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wicourts.gov\/ca\/opinion\/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&amp;seqNo=53658\">State v. Harrell<\/a>, 2010 WI App 132, 329 Wis. 2d 480, 791 N.W.2d 677 (2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s claim that he did not consent was not properly preserved at trial. United States v. Strother, 387 Fed. Appx. 508 (5th Cir. August 18, 2010) (unpublished).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s vehicle had just been registered, and it was not in the computer system. The officer was entitled to keep checking because of prior experience with false registrations, and defendant consented during that time period. United States v. Justice, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87128 (E.D. Ky. August 24, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4594\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4594"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4594\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}