{"id":45843,"date":"2020-10-20T02:44:52","date_gmt":"2020-10-20T07:44:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=45843"},"modified":"2020-10-20T02:44:52","modified_gmt":"2020-10-20T07:44:52","slug":"ca7-ptf-was-a-trespasser-who-had-no-rep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=45843","title":{"rendered":"CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Plaintiff as a trespasser had no reasonable expectation of privacy to make a Fourth Amendment complaint. \u201cJust as a trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property, a trespasser also lacks a possessory interest in the property. The very definition of &#8216;trespass,&#8217; after all, is the interference of another&#8217;s possessory interest.\u201d \u201cEven if Dix alleged that there was a Fourth Amendment \u2018seizure,\u2019 to \u2018state a constitutional violation,\u2019 he must also allege that \u2018the seizure \u2026 was \u201cunreasonable.\u201d\u2019 \u2026 Case law compels our next conclusion: that even if a seizure occurred here, it was reasonable.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&amp;Path=Y2020\/D10-19\/C:18-2970:J:PerCuriam:aut:T:fnOp:N:2598166:S:0\">Dix v. Edelman Fin. Servs.<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32883 (7th Cir. Oct. 19, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2255 petitioner\u2019s claim defense counsel was deficient in failing to investigate a Franks challenge fails on the merits of that challenge. Sims v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192882 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff as a trespasser had no reasonable expectation of privacy to make a Fourth Amendment complaint. \u201cJust as a trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property, a trespasser also lacks a possessory interest in the property. The &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=45843\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-standing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45843"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45844,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45843\/revisions\/45844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}