Habeas petitioner\u2019s allegation state court decision on his Fourth Amendment claim was erroneous isn\u2019t enough to get appellate review under Stone. CoA denied. Cisneros v. Sec’y, Dept. of Correction, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30618 (11th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is no basis for a CoA in this case. Reasonable jurists would not disagree that defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not raising a Fourth Amendment claim on any of the grounds stated because they all would fail on the merits. Faison v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30643 (3d Cir. Aug. 11, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Habeas petitioner\u2019s allegation state court decision on his Fourth Amendment claim was erroneous isn\u2019t enough to get appellate review under Stone. CoA denied. Cisneros v. Sec’y, Dept. of Correction, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30618 (11th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020).* There … Continue reading