Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy not to have a tattoo on his chest under his shirt photographed on his arrest. Therefore, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not raising it. Shumpert v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149584 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 19, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ohio statute grants parolees the right to reasonable suspicion and notice for a parole search, and that goes beyond what the Fourth Amendment requires. Here, that was lacking and the good faith exception does not apply. State v. Campbell<\/a>, 2020-Ohio-4119, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3016 (5th Dist. Aug. 19, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n An affidavit for search warrant issued four days after the fourth controlled buy from defendant\u2019s address. That wasn\u2019t stale. State v. Waiters<\/a>, 2020-Ohio-4126, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3014 (5th Dist. Aug. 19, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy not to have a tattoo on his chest under his shirt photographed on his arrest. Therefore, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not raising it. Shumpert v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149584 … Continue reading