\u201cTo the extent Plaintiff is asserting a denial of medical care after his arrest, but before he arrived at the detention facility, district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held that law enforcement officers are required to provide objectively reasonable post-arrest care under the Fourth Amendment. See Neuroth v. Mendocino County, No. 15-cv-03226-RS, 2018 WL 418957 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2018); Borges v. County of Eureka, No. 15-cv-00846-YGR, 2017 WL 363212, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2017).\u201d Here, the factual allegations don\u2019t make a claim. Jones v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137307 (D. Nev. July 10, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cTo the extent Plaintiff is asserting a denial of medical care after his arrest, but before he arrived at the detention facility, district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held that law enforcement officers are required to provide objectively reasonable … Continue reading