Connecting already seized cell phone to the internet was not shown to be a search (citing no law). United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136292 (E.D. Wash. July 2, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress for alleged perjury in a search warrant application is purely speculative. There are ready plausible responses to his claim. Winbrone v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136382 (D. Me. July 31, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s 1983 case over his allegedly illegal arrest still in a pending state case is barred by Younger abstention. Phillips v. Reinhart, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136644 (E.D. Cal. July 30, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Connecting already seized cell phone to the internet was not shown to be a search (citing no law). United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136292 (E.D. Wash. July 2, 2020). 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for … Continue reading