{"id":44491,"date":"2020-07-13T09:59:40","date_gmt":"2020-07-13T14:59:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44491"},"modified":"2020-07-13T10:00:05","modified_gmt":"2020-07-13T15:00:05","slug":"e-d-ky-ruse-of-police-looking-for-missing-child-was-not-voluntary-consent-to-enter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44491","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Ky.: Ruse of police looking for missing child was not voluntary consent to enter"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Using a ruse of a missing child to gain entry invalidated the alleged consent. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Turner, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120630 (E.D. Ky. July 9, 2020):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Here, the issue is whether the officers&#8217; story about searching for the missing young white boy to obtain entry into the residence invalidated Ms. Miller&#8217;s purported consent. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that it did, and therefore, the evidence which was seized subsequent to the invalid consent must be suppressed.<\/p><p>The Court recognizes that a &#8220;a ruse or officers&#8217; undercover activity does not usually violate individuals&#8217; rights.&#8221; United States v. Hardin, 539 F.3d 404, 424 (6th Cir. 2008). For instance, as the United States points out, an officer&#8217;s misrepresentation of his identity does not negate consent. (Doc. # 109 at 5); United States v. Lord, 230 F. App&#8217;x 511, 513-14 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing United States v. Pollard, 215 F.3d 643, 648 (6th Cir.2000)). However, &#8220;[i]n some instances, a ruse or trick by the police can undermine an otherwise consensual encounter.&#8221; United States v. Gregory, 456 F. App&#8217;x 533, 536 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing Hardin, 539 F.3d at 424-27). More specifically, when a police officer&#8217;s &#8220;misrepresentation of purpose [was] so extreme that it deprive[d] the individual of the ability to make a fair assessment of the need to surrender his privacy,&#8221; consent is invalidated. Id. at 536 (alterations in original) (quoting Hardin, 539 F.3d at 425). In answering this question, courts must ask &#8220;whether the ruse created a scenario where [the individual] &#8216;ha[d] no choice&#8217; but to concede his privacy interests.&#8221; Id. (alterations in original) (citing Hardin, 539 F.3d at 425).<\/p><p>Of course, this determination is highly fact dependent. For instance, in Hardin, following the issuance of an arrest warrant, the police received a tip that the defendant was staying at his girlfriend&#8217;s apartment. Hardin, 539 F.3d at 407. The police then instructed the apartment manager to search the apartment for the defendant under the guise of checking for a water leak. Id. The urgency of a water leak, as conveyed through an apartment manager, compelled the defendant to allow entry, and thus, invalidated consent. Id. at 425.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Using a ruse of a missing child to gain entry invalidated the alleged consent. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Turner, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120630 (E.D. Ky. July 9, 2020):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44491"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44493,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44491\/revisions\/44493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}