Use of cell site simulator merely to capture defendant\u2019s cell phone numbers and not to track him was reasonable because he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his numbers. United States v. Powell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120229 (E.D. Mich. July 9, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Based on how the purported inventory occurred and the nature of the search of the vehicle, the search of the vehicle was unreasonable and inventory was a pretext. Combs v. State<\/a>, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 289 (July 9, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant wasn\u2019t denied access to the search warrant materials to claim justification for a motion for new trial. State v. Mock<\/a>, 2020-Ohio-3667, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2605 (8th Dist. July 9, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Use of cell site simulator merely to capture defendant\u2019s cell phone numbers and not to track him was reasonable because he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his numbers. United States v. Powell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120229 (E.D. … Continue reading