{"id":43793,"date":"2020-05-19T07:02:13","date_gmt":"2020-05-19T12:02:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43793"},"modified":"2020-05-19T07:02:13","modified_gmt":"2020-05-19T12:02:13","slug":"ca6-ptf-stated-claim-for-unreasonable-continued-detention-after-states-case-collapsed-when-forensic-search-of-computer-came-up-negative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43793","title":{"rendered":"CA6: Ptf stated claim for unreasonable continued detention after state&#8217;s case collapsed when forensic search of computer came up negative"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Plaintiff was arrested for child pornography when officers executed a search warrant at his house based on a video uploaded via the IP address and router in the house. There was probable cause for the arrest, but not for the continued detention after a forensic report didn\u2019t produce any sign of the video. \u201cIn the present case, there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether probable cause for Jones&#8217; continued detention dissolved once Murray received the results of the forensic examination on January 11, 2014. It could be reasonably inferred that the Commonwealth lacked the evidence it needed to continue its prosecution of Jones once the forensic examination failed to connect Jones&#8217; devices with the video. In fact, the prosecutors admitted that it was the weakness of the forensic report relative to Daniel&#8217;s report that justified the dismissal of charges.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/20a0153p-06.pdf\">Jones v. Clark County<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15855 (6th Cir. May 18, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff was arrested for child pornography when officers executed a search warrant at his house based on a video uploaded via the IP address and router in the house. There was probable cause for the arrest, but not for the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43793\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,50,12,101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-45","category-arrest-or-entry-on-arrest","category-computer-searches","category-overseizure"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=43793"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43794,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43793\/revisions\/43794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=43793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=43793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=43793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}