Person who was loaned a truck had a sufficient possessory interest for standing. The stop was found otherwise valid, and the video showed defendant nodding his consent. United States v. Sanchez-Perez, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62773 (D. Kan. June 23, 2010):<\/p>\n
Here, defendant accurately gave the owner\u2019s name, said the owner was his cousin, and said the owner had loaned him the truck. A computer check revealed that the automobile had not been reported stolen, and the insurance, although expired, was in the name of the person defendant said was his cousin who loaned him the truck. These facts are sufficient to establish a valid possessory interest in the truck, supporting defendant\u2019s challenge to his detention and to the search of the truck.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
In a controlled drug delivery, defendant answered the door, and the package was offered. He got a woman who came to the door and said that she lived there and was expecting the package. That was apparent authority to consent to a search of the apartment. United States v. Gonzalez<\/a>, 609 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading