{"id":43340,"date":"2020-04-04T09:12:45","date_gmt":"2020-04-04T14:12:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43340"},"modified":"2020-04-04T09:14:09","modified_gmt":"2020-04-04T14:14:09","slug":"or-asking-about-drugs-in-car-during-an-unavoidable-lull-in-stop-unreasonable-under-state-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43340","title":{"rendered":"OR: Asking about drugs in car during an \u201cunavoidable lull\u201d in traffic stop was unreasonable under state constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Asking about drugs in the car during an \u201cunavoidable lull\u201d in the stop was unreasonable under the state constitution under Arreola-Botello. <a href=\"https:\/\/cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org\/ui\/custom\/default\/collection\/coll_p17027coll3\/resources\/custompages\/OJDRedirect.html?collection=p17027coll5&amp;identifier=A163302A.pdf\">State v. McBride<\/a>, 303 Ore. App. 292, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 433 (Apr. 1, 2020), on remand from <a href=\"https:\/\/cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org\/digital\/pdf.js\/web\/viewer.html?file=\/digital\/api\/collection\/p17027coll3\/id\/7572\/download#page=1&amp;zoom=auto\">366 Ore. 97<\/a>, 455 P.3d 925 (2020):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>In this case, O&#8217;Donnell had probable cause to believe that defendant had committed a traffic infraction when she failed to signal a turn and, therefore, was permitted to stop her to investigate that infraction. But, like the officer in Arreola-Botello, O&#8217;Donnell asked a question that was not reasonably related to that investigation\u2014i.e., whether defendant had drugs in her car. If there were evidence that, during the stop, O&#8217;Donnell &#8220;had learned facts giving rise to reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged or was about to engage in criminal conduct, an expanded investigation could have been justified,&#8221; id. at 714, but in this case, there is no such evidence. At the time that O&#8217;Donnell asked whether defendant had drugs in her car, he did not have &#8220;any particularized [reasonable] suspicion that defendant had * * * controlled substances * * * in [her] vehicle.&#8221; Id. Because O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s inquiry regarding drugs was not reasonably related to the purpose of the traffic stop, and did not have an independent constitutional justification, it violated the subject-matter limitation that Article I, section 9, imposes on investigative inquiries during an ongoing seizure.<\/p><p>Further, we conclude the evidence obtained as a result of O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s unlawful question to defendant and obtained as a result of the search of defendant&#8217;s vehicle should be suppressed because it was the product of an unconstitutional act. See id. (recognizing that generally &#8220;evidence will be suppressed if the evidence was the product of an unconstitutional act&#8221;).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Asking about drugs in the car during an \u201cunavoidable lull\u201d in the stop was unreasonable under the state constitution under Arreola-Botello. State v. McBride, 303 Ore. App. 292, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 433 (Apr. 1, 2020), on remand from 366 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43340\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-state-constitution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=43340"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43340\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43342,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43340\/revisions\/43342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=43340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=43340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=43340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}