{"id":43258,"date":"2020-04-02T06:23:45","date_gmt":"2020-04-02T11:23:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43258"},"modified":"2020-04-02T06:23:45","modified_gmt":"2020-04-02T11:23:45","slug":"w-d-ky-franks-challenge-fails-because-of-complete-lack-of-materiality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43258","title":{"rendered":"W.D.Ky.: <em>Franks<\/em> challenge fails because of complete lack of materiality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Moreover, Perkins did not \u2014 and cannot \u2014 make a preliminary showing that any alleged \u2018false statement or material omission [was] necessary to the probable cause finding in the affidavit.\u2019 If the Court were to strike every contested statement from the affidavit, the following facts would remain: \u2026\u201d United States v. Perkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53762 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 27, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Petitioner \u201cclaims that counsel should have argued that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause, and that the affiant omitted material facts from the warrant application. When a defendant&#8217;s claim of ineffectiveness is based on counsel&#8217;s failure to file a motion to suppress, a defendant must \u2018prove the motion was meritorious.\u2019 \u2026 Mr. Jones has not done so, as the warrant was amply supported by probable cause.\u201d \u201cThe affidavit here contained abundant support for a finding that a search of the phone was likely to uncover evidence of a crime.\u201d United States v. Jones, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53088 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 27, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Moreover, Perkins did not \u2014 and cannot \u2014 make a preliminary showing that any alleged \u2018false statement or material omission [was] necessary to the probable cause finding in the affidavit.\u2019 If the Court were to strike every contested statement from &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=43258\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=43258"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43258\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43259,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43258\/revisions\/43259"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=43258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=43258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=43258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}