{"id":4303,"date":"2010-09-06T20:27:35","date_gmt":"2010-06-17T07:24:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-06-17T07:24:12","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4303","title":{"rendered":"CA7: 911 hangup and no answer on call back is probable cause"},"content":{"rendered":"

A 911 hangup and no answer on call back is probable cause. Hanson v. Dane County<\/a>, 608 F.3d 335 (7th Cir. 2010):<\/p>\n

[A] 911 call provides probable cause for entry, if a call back goes unanswered. The 911 line is supposed to be used for emergencies only. A lack of an answer on the return of an incomplete emergency call implies that the caller is unable to pick up the phone\u2014because of injury, illness (a heart attack, for example), or a threat of violence. See United States v. Jenkins<\/a>, 329 F.3d 579, 581 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Richardson<\/a>, 208 F.3d 626, 629\u201330 (7th Cir. 2000). Any of these three possibilities supplies both probable cause and an exigent circumstance that dispenses with the need for a warrant. See Brigham City v. Stuart<\/a>, 547 U.S. 398 (2006). There are of course other possibilities. Perhaps a child dialed 911 by mistake, or perhaps the ringer had been set to silent so the phone did not alert anyone to the incoming call from the 911 dispatcher. But probable cause just means a good reason to act (the fourth amendment protects people against \u201cunreasonable\u201d searches and seizures); it does not mean certainty, or even more likely than not, that a crime has been committed or a medical emergency is ongoing. See Illinois v. Gates<\/a>, 462 U.S. 213, 235 (1983).<\/p>\n

Karen asked the police to leave, but officers who have probable cause need not cancel an investigation on request. The fourth amendment does not contain a least restrictive-alternative rule. See Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives\u2019 Association<\/a>, 489 U.S. 602, 629 n.9 (1989). Nor did Karen\u2019s statement that she was unharmed establish that there was no need for further inquiry. … To the contrary, her statements supported the officers\u2019 actions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4303"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4303\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}