A dog sniff of a postal package in Pittsburgh was conducted after Postal Inspectors there were alerted the package was coming by Postal Inspectors in Los Angeles, with a fictitious return address. A search warrant was prepared for the package, and then the address where the package was going. The SW was issued with probable cause, and, in any event, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Morris, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57661 (W.D. Pa. June 10, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel could not be ineffective for not challenging a search where there the defendant clearly had no standing. Hairston v. State<\/a>, 314 S.W.3d 356 (Mo. App. 2010).*<\/p>\n Defendant was stopped for a noisy exhaust, but the officer found that he had a suspended license. His car was subject to towing and inventory even under Gant decided shortly after the arrest but before the suppression hearing. Marijuana was seen in plain view. State v. Swinderman<\/a>, 2010 Ohio 2659, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 2182 (5th Dist. June 10, 2010).*<\/p>\n The video of defendant\u2019s driving shows cause for his stop for DUI. State v. Soller<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 471 (June 9, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading