{"id":42942,"date":"2020-03-15T10:47:31","date_gmt":"2020-03-15T15:47:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=42942"},"modified":"2020-03-15T10:47:31","modified_gmt":"2020-03-15T15:47:31","slug":"ca2-even-assuming-this-supervised-release-search-lacked-rs-there-were-facts-supporting-it-and-the-exclusionary-rule-will-not-be-applied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=42942","title":{"rendered":"CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Even if the supervised release search here was without reasonable suspicion, the purposes of the exclusionary rule aren\u2019t served. \u201cEven assuming [Officer] Dyckman acted unreasonably in failing to conduct further investigation before executing the search, this is not the kind of flagrant or abusive police misconduct that warrants application of the exclusionary rule. Bearing in mind that the exclusionary rule \u2018applies only where it \u201cresults in appreciable deterrence,\u201d\u2019 Herring, 555 U.S. at 141 (alteration omitted) (quoting United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 909, 104 S. Ct. 3405, 82 L. Ed. 2d 677 (1984), and weighing the deterrent effect against the serious cost of \u2018letting guilty and possibly dangerous defendants go free,\u2019 United States v. Julius, 610 F.3d 60, 66 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Herring, 555 U.S. at 141), we conclude that, in the circumstances here, the substantial social costs of suppressing the evidence obtained during the search of Elder’s home outweigh the incremental deterrent value of granting it. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err when it denied Elder’s motion to suppress.\u201d United States v. Elder<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7520 (2d Cir. Mar. 9, 2020).*
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Even if the supervised release search here was without reasonable suspicion, the purposes of the exclusionary rule aren\u2019t served. \u201cEven assuming [Officer] Dyckman acted unreasonably in failing to conduct further investigation before executing the search, this is not the kind … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-probationparole-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42942"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42943,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42942\/revisions\/42943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}