{"id":42756,"date":"2020-03-01T13:59:18","date_gmt":"2020-03-01T18:59:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=42756"},"modified":"2020-03-02T08:59:18","modified_gmt":"2020-03-02T13:59:18","slug":"de-a-few-questions-unrelated-to-the-purpose-of-the-stop-didnt-measurably-extend-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=42756","title":{"rendered":"DE: A few questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop didn&#8217;t measurably extend it"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Questions asked of defendant that were unrelated to the justification for his traffic stop did not measurably extend the traffic stop. Although an officer&#8217;s questions about defendant&#8217;s two cell phones, children and the beach were unrelated to defendant&#8217;s failure to signal a lane change, the officer did not create a second seizure simply by asking these questions. Even if the stop was measurably extended, the inevitable discovery doctrine applied because the officer was lawfully in a position to observe a gun in plain view. <a href=\"https:\/\/courts.delaware.gov\/Opinions\/Download.aspx?id=302370\">State v. Maddrey<\/a>, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 103 (Feb. 25, 2020).<br \/><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The USMJ\u2019s finding that the good faith exception applied to this facially valid warrant is adopted. United States v. Arroyo-Quinones, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33811 (D.P.R. Feb. 25, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Questions asked of defendant that were unrelated to the justification for his traffic stop did not measurably extend the traffic stop. Although an officer&#8217;s questions about defendant&#8217;s two cell phones, children and the beach were unrelated to defendant&#8217;s failure to &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=42756\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42756","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42756","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42756"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42756\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42770,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42756\/revisions\/42770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}