The collective knowledge doctrine doesn\u2019t require every officer to know everything. Pueblo\u00a0 v. Jim\u00e9ne, 2020 PR App. LEXIS 278 (P.R. App. Jan. 30, 2020). (That, of course, is evident from the word “collective.”).<\/p>\n
A year typo in the affidavit\u2019s narrative presented in chronological order could be ignored as a scrivener\u2019s error. The investigation started December 2016 and ended January 2017. There was probable cause on the totality. United States v. Kessler, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29950 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 21, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The collective knowledge doctrine doesn\u2019t require every officer to know everything. Pueblo\u00a0 v. Jim\u00e9ne, 2020 PR App. LEXIS 278 (P.R. App. Jan. 30, 2020). (That, of course, is evident from the word “collective.”). A year typo in the affidavit\u2019s narrative … Continue reading