Stop and frisk was with reasonable suspicion. \u201cHaving received a radio communication that Defendant appeared to be armed and having observed Defendant reaching toward his waist in a manner consistent with reaching towards an area of the body where individuals are known to conceal firearms, it was reasonable for Detective Arriola to believe himself in danger and to determine quickly if Miles was armed.\u201d United States v. Miles, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19919 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2020).*<\/p>\n
Walmart\u2019s surveillance video alone does not give probable cause to believe that plaintiff was participating in a friend\u2019s theft from the store, and the qualified immunity appeal is fact dependent and thus denied. Robinson v. Miller<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3648 (4th Cir. Feb. 6, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Stop and frisk was with reasonable suspicion. \u201cHaving received a radio communication that Defendant appeared to be armed and having observed Defendant reaching toward his waist in a manner consistent with reaching towards an area of the body where individuals … Continue reading