{"id":41479,"date":"2019-12-27T00:04:45","date_gmt":"2019-12-27T05:04:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41479"},"modified":"2019-12-26T16:42:55","modified_gmt":"2019-12-26T21:42:55","slug":"ga-officers-had-pc-a-knife-used-in-a-murder-was-in-a-well-the-sw-said-curtilage-and-didnt-have-to-say-well-to-be-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41479","title":{"rendered":"GA: Officers had PC a knife used in a murder was in a well; the SW said &#8220;curtilage&#8221; and didn&#8217;t have to say &#8220;well&#8221; to be valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Officers obtained a search warrant involving a 34\u00bd year old murder. After charges were filed the state sought a second search warrant to search a well for evidence. There was a substantial basis for searching the well based on the statement of a witness that the knife allegedly used to murder the victim was disposed of there. The search warrant said \u201cincluding the curtilage\u201d and did not have to say \u201cwell.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gasupreme.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/s19a1582.pdf\">Gebhardt v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 846 (Dec. 23, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAppellant&#8217;s argument that his CSLI was obtained illegally because the police used a subpoena rather than a court order is contradicted by the record, which shows that the police did use a court order to obtain the CSLI.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gasupreme.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/s19a1342.pdf\">Reed v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 837 (Dec. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n<p>AT&#038;T complied with the search warrant for cell phone records with a certificate of authenticity which made it admissible. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gasupreme.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/s19g0472.pdf\">Nicholson v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 844 (Dec. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Officers obtained a search warrant involving a 34\u00bd year old murder. After charges were filed the state sought a second search warrant to search a well for evidence. There was a substantial basis for searching the well based on the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41479\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[124,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-admissibility-of-evidence","category-curtilage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41480,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41479\/revisions\/41480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}