Officers had information a passenger was on the \u201cFBI\u2019s terrorist watch list,\u2019 and that was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. Finally, there was consent. United States v. Abdow, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44582 (D. Minn. February 22, 2010).*<\/p>\n
The stop of defendant\u2019s car was with probable cause, as was the search. Defendant\u2019s consent argument fails because the court finds he intended to consent, despite the language barrier. United States v. Valenzuela-Beltran, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44490 (W.D. La. April 21, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Information about controlled buy relayed to officer who stopped the car was sufficient for a stop. United States v. Garcia, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44162 (D. Minn. March 22, 2010).*<\/p>\n
In a Brooklyn search warrant sought by the Joint Terrorism Task Force, the items seized were all within the scope of the warrant. The government still has to show relevance at trial. United States v. Defreitas, 701 F. Supp. 2d 309 (E.D. N.Y. May 6, 2010),* prior opinion 701 F. Supp. 2d 297 (E.D. N.Y. 2010).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading