General consent to search defendant\u2019s car included a backpack in the backseat. United States v. Cruz-Castro, 378 Fed. Appx. 632 (9th Cir. 2010) (unpublished), cert. denied 2010 U.S.
\nLEXIS 7226 (U.S., Oct. 4, 2010), cert. denied 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7249 (U.S., Oct. 4, 2010).*<\/p>\n
A citizen complaint that the defendant threatened him with a knife while standing in a movie line was reasonable suspicion for a patdown for the knife under Terry. Harrod v. State, 192 Md. App. 85, 993 A.2d 1113 (2010).*<\/p>\n
The evidence supports the conclusion that the search warrant was issued before the search. Defendant\u2019s affidavit in a motion to reconsider was of no effect. State v. Anderson, 2010 Ohio 1886, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 1564 (6th Dist. April 30, 2010).*<\/p>\n
The officer stopped defendant\u2019s vehicle, and he could smell marijuana. Defendant\u2019s admission that he had marijuana justified a drug dog sniff and the alert justified a search. State v. Wright, 155 Wn. App. 537, 230 P.3d 1063 (2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading